The vaccines are frozen to keep the PARASITES from growing! Dr. Jane Ruby has found SHOCKING discoveries on the truth of what is ACTUALLY in these vaccines! Watch this new segment NOW at StewPeters.co
A study examining the diets of more than 600,000 people and COVID-19 is examined when Dr. Andrew Chan joins “The Weight Loss Champion” Chuck Carroll on The Exam Room Podcast.
– Immune response of someone eating standard diet vs. plant-based diet
– Why a plant-based diet could reduce severity of infection
– Inflammatory responses to food and fighting infection
– Best foods for strongest immune response
Dr. Chan is co-author of the peer-reviewed study and is a professor of immunology and infectious diseases at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
COVID-19 Vegan Diet Study https://bit.ly/CovidDietStudy
Subscribe to The Exam Room Podcast Apple: https://apple.co/2JXBkpy Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2pMLoY3 Physicians Committee Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/physiciansc… Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PCRM.org Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/pcrm Dr. Andy Chan Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/AndyChanMD Chuck Carroll Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chuckcarrol… Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chuckcarrollwlc Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/weightlossch…
— About Us The Physicians Committee is dedicated to saving lives through plant-based diets and ethical and effective scientific research. We combine the clout and expertise of more than 12,000 physicians with the dedicated actions of more than 175,000 members across the United States and around the world.
Connect With Us Website: https://www.PCRM.org
Barnard Medical Center: https://www.pcrm.org/barnard-medical-…
The Food for Life Program: http://fflclasses.org/
The 21-Day Vegan Kickstart App https://kickstart.pcrm.org/en
Rob Verkerk, Ph.D., co-director of Alliance for Health International, reflects on the pandemic and specifically on three statistics that he says created huge polarisation depending on their interpretation: the number of COVID-19 deaths, cases and adverse reactions to the vaccines.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.
In the wake of the Better Way conference in Bath (U.K.), it’s been nothing short of mind-blowing sharing time over the last two weeks with fellow activists for better health systems, if that’s how we should refer to what we’re trying to co-create.
With some irony, it is the orchestrated, global deception and broad mismanagement of SARS-CoV-2 by health authorities that have brought so many of us together — groups of people from diverse backgrounds, including doctors, other health practitioners, scientists and lawyers — along with millions of others around the world.
People who wouldn’t have come together otherwise, or at least within such a compressed time frame. So with all the suffering that’s occurred, the unnecessary lives lost, the grief, the iatrogenically injured, the lost livelihoods, the social deprivation and the shifting sands of power structures, we must still find some space for gratitude.
Thank you, COVID-19 (C19), for being a catalyst for a revolution that was desperately needed, one that allows liberty, human creativity, hope and nature to conspire in ways that facilitate the future fitness of our species.
Some may still want to choose a shackled life that is designed and determined in ivory towers and corporate board rooms but let that be a choice, not our sole option.
With that said, I wanted to take you on a short journey that includes some of the reflections I’ve shared over the last few days with some of our international collaborators, all brought together under the umbrella of the World Council for Health.
You’ll find short extracts of some of these reflections recorded in our offices in Chilworth (Surrey, U.K.), with Dr. Naseeba Kathrada (South Africa), Dr. Mark Trozzi (Canada), Rain Trozzi (Canada), Meleni Aldridge and myself.
In this piece, I want to reflect specifically on three statistics that have dominated many minds and created huge polarisation depending on their interpretation.
- C19 deaths.
- C19 cases.
- vaccination adverse events.
Official figures on all three tend to be unreliable, spurious or are widely misrepresented or misinterpreted, and cannot be relied upon to understand the real impacts of C19 disease, as distinguished from the impacts of the human response, statistical noise or statistical manipulation.
Prof. Norman Fenton and colleagues’ dismantling of official U.K. data of C19 injected and uninjected cases, previously widely regarded as the most reliable dataset available internationally, provided a stark reminder of how deception can work.
Reflecting on the dead
As painful as it might be for those of us who’ve lost loved ones over the last two years, it’s necessary to reflect on the mortality data associated with C19 if we’re not to see history repeated.
Reported C19 deaths were always conflated with other causes, as, in the majority of countries, they always represented deaths reported from any cause that occurred within specified time frames (e.g. 28 days, 60 days) of a positive C19 antigen (usually Polymerase Chain Reaction, or PCR) test.
Many of these reported deaths were in hospitals where the sickest people tend to go, and hospitals were also among the most likely places to contract an infection, and certainly, the most likely place to test for C19 status using a flawed diagnostic technique, based on the various C19 RT-PCR (real time-PCR) platforms.
Continue reading on Source: 3 COVID Stats — What They Tell Us and How They Divided Our World
JUNE 2020 – Bill Gates announced a startup called BIOMILQ. It’s backed by some of the richest investors in the world, like Zuckerburg. It raised $3.5 million in Series A funding from Breakthrough Energy Ventures. Breakthrough Energy Ventures is Bill Gates’ investment firm focused on climate change.
SEPTEMBER 2020 – Remember that $3.5 million in BIOMILQ money? Well, according to a receipt from the Gates Foundation, it paid The Guardian $3.5 million in September 2020. This was an initial offering from the Gates Foundation. Of course, right after on September 27, the Guardian published an article entitled “Antibodies in breast milk remain for 10 months after Covid infection – study.”
February 2022 – Customs and Border Patrol officers said that they inspected 17 separate shipments of formulas that came from Europe. Border patrol consulted with the FDA. Of course, the FDA said it had safety concerns about noncompliant baby formula. The same month, the FDA announces it is looking into bacterial contamination at the Abbott formula production plant in Michigan that’s supposedly behind the baby formula shortage.
MAY 2022 – The Gates Foundation paid the Guardian again as part of annual funding. The very next day, The Guardian wasted no time and published a hit-piece on breastfeeding. It’s called “Turns out breastfeeding really does hurt – why does no one tell you?”
GATES FOUNDATION: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2020/09/inv017377
FDA PRESS RELEASES ON FORMULA PRODUCTION: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/fda-newsroom/press-announcements
MY PATRIOT SUPPLY: Hi, fellow doomsday preppers. Concerned about all the farmland burning down? It’s time to have a 3-month supply of emergency food and supplies ready. https://mypatriotsupply.com/?rfsn=6583347.5aba598
ABOUT ALLISON/HELP SUPPORT: https://www.givesendgo.com/allisonroyal
Dr. Judy Mikovits joins Alex Jones live via Skype to break down how essentially all vaccines are tainted with a variety of viruses by a group of eugenics scientists who want to change human DNA.
Dr. McCullough on a “Save a Generation Tour” with key messages and trailer for his new book: “Courage to Face COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalizations and Deaths while Battling the Biopharmaceutical Complex” Go to couragetofacecovid.com
5 Key Points on COVID-19
1a.) It spreads through the air (therefore there is no point in sterilizing surfaces)
1b.) Spreads from a sick person to a susceptible person (asymptomatic spread is negligible)
2.) No scientific support for asymptomatic testing (false positives)
3.) Natural Immunity is Robust and Protective
4.) The virus has always been treatable (95% of lives could have been saved)
5.) The vaccines are not sufficiently safe or effective
“The mass vaccination program worldwide has failed. In fact, [it] has made things worse.”
Will the blatant fear porn ever stop? The controlled media have no shame.
If Ronald Reagan were still with us, I suspect we would be hearing “There you go again” replays. First came the coordinated media blast of public health-related fearporn. For example, the image from Jake Tapper’s CNN broadcast program “The Lead” of May 20,2022 (above) which appears to me to be a case of smallpox, not monkeypox. Another example involves the self-explanatory paired images below.
Continue reading on Source: Monkey Pox Update
Politicians and public health officials are delivering mixed and confusing messages to the public about the origins of the monkeypox outbreak and the level of risk it poses to the public, while pharmaceutical companies are preparing to introduce monkeypox vaccines.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.
As an unprecedented outbreak of monkeypox spreads throughout the west, questions continue to swirl around the origin of the outbreak, the risk it poses to the public and the measures that may or may not be required to contain the virus.
Some also wondered how unexpected the outbreak was after learning about a March 2021 tabletop simulation of a hypothetical deadly outbreak of monkeypox predicted to occur in May 2022.
The Nuclear Threat Initiative and the Munich Security Conference — entities closely connected to the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security — conducted the tabletop exercise.
Some analysts suggested the outbreak may have resulted from gain-of-function research or similar experiments involving the virus, while others floated the theory that malign actors, perhaps related to the conflict in Ukraine, intentionally released the virus.
Meanwhile, politicians and public health officials are delivering mixed and confusing messages to the public about the level of risk, while pharmaceutical companies are preparing to introduce monkeypox vaccines.
WHO responds with emergency meeting — just prior to its World Health Assembly
The World Health Organization (WHO) said it has considered monkeypox a “priority pathogen” for several years. Nevertheless, the new outbreak led the agency on May 20 to hold an emergency meeting of its Strategic and Technical Advisory Group on Infectious Hazards with Pandemic and Endemic Potential (STAG-IH) to discuss monkeypox.
STAG-IH, comprised of experts and scientists from around the world and chaired by David Heymann, professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, advises the WHO on infection risks that could threaten global public health.
STAG-IH does not have the authority to declare a public health emergency of international concern — the WHO’s highest form of alert — which is currently active in relation to COVID-19.
The WHO convened the emergency meeting even though the organization was already set to meet for its World Health Assembly May 22-28 in Geneva, Switzerland — where members discussed proposed amendments to the existing International Health Regulations 2005, and where WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was re-elected without opposition to a second five-year term.
The WEF also held its annual meeting May 22-26 — in Davos, Switzerland, not far from Geneva.
Monkeypox response described as ‘gaslighting’
Continue reading on Source: As Questions Swirl Around Monkeypox Origins and Risk, Vaccine Makers Set Sights on Profits
Considering the mounting evidence of adverse effects and lack of effectiveness, some physicians and health agencies are calling for the immediate withdrawal of the COVID-19 vaccines.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.
Story at a glance:
- A previously healthy 36-year-old mother of two died 11 days after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 shot; her death was deemed to be caused by myocarditis due to the shot.
- Emergency calls for cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome increased more than 25% among 16- to 39-year-olds from January to May 2021, compared to the same time period in 2019 and 2020.
- Pfizer deliberately excluded pregnant women from COVID-19 shot trials; the recommendation that the shots are safe and effective for pregnant women was based on a 42-day study involving 44 rats.
- Research conducted by the New York State Department of Health found the shots’ effectiveness declined rapidly among 5- to 11-year-olds, falling from 68% to just 12%.
- Considering the adverse effects and lack of effectiveness, many have called for an immediate withdrawal of the shots.
A previously healthy 36-year-old mother of two died 11 days after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 shot. Initially, her cause of death was deemed inconclusive, but at an inquest, pathologist Dr. Sukhvinder Ghataura explained that he believes the COVID-19 shot was to blame.
“On the balance of probabilities, she had vaccine-related problems. There is nothing else for me to hang my hat on. It is the most likely reason, in my conclusion. It is more than likely Dawn died in response to the Covid jab.”
Government officials continue to deny deaths linked to Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 shot.
In the U.S., they’ve acknowledged only nine deaths as causally associated with Johnson and Johnson’s COVID-19 shot as of May 10. But this case, which occurred in the U.K., highlights the potential dangers of shot-induced myocarditis.
According to Ghataura, the woman had several signs of myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, including inflammation of the heart, fluid in the lungs and a small clot in her lungs.
She had also reported menstrual irregularities, jaw pain and arm pain. When asked by a family member whether he believed the woman would still be alive today if she hadn’t received the shot, Ghataura said, “It’s a difficult question but I would say yes.”
COVID-19 shots increase heart attack risk by 25% in youth
At the conclusion of the inquest regarding the woman’s death, assistant coroner Alison McCormick stated, “I give the narrative conclusion that her death was caused by acute myocarditis, due to recent Covid-19 immunization.”
Myocarditis is a recognized adverse effect of mRNA COVID-19 shots and one that has been named in other deaths.
Dr. Neil Singh Dhalla, a CEO of a major health clinic, fell asleep four days after he got a COVID-19 booster shot — and died from a heart attack.
The autopsy stated myocarditis. He was only 48 years old and had never had heart problems in his life. In another example, epidemiologists confirmed that two teenage boys from different U.S. states died of myocarditis days after getting the Pfizer shot.
Both had received second doses of the shot. In a study that examined the autopsy findings, it’s reported that the “myocarditis” described in the boys’ deaths is “not typical myocarditis pathology”:
“The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis and has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy. Understanding that these instances are different from typical myocarditis and that cytokine storm has a known feedback loop with catecholamines may help guide screening and therapy.”
An astounding study published in Scientific Reports further revealed that calls to Israel’s National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome increased more than 25% among 16- to 39-year-olds from January 2021 to May 2021, compared to the same time period in 2019 and 2020.
Continue reading on Source: Deaths, Injuries and Waning Efficacy: The Latest Bad News on COVID Vaccines
Medical And Legal Resources To Defend Your Freedom … Advocates for Liberty, Health, and Justice. Join Us.…
1 FACT ONE COVID is not as dangerous as previously thought
“The Median COVID-19 infection fatality rate was 0.27%.”.
In February 2020 the predictions of the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR), or “death rate” from COVID were estimated by the World Health organization (WHO) to be 3.4% . We were told that COVID was much more deadly than the seasonal flu and we must “flatten the curve” to avoid overwhelming the hospitals . Seven months later, the WHO acknowledges in its own report that “infection fatality rates tended to be much lower than estimates made earlier in the pandemic”. The WHO’s report found the “median COVID infection fatality rate was 0.27%”. Other studies support this finding with IFRs of between .32% – .01%. By comparison, the flu has an IFR of .1% – .2%. The former Director of Israel’s Health Ministry said, “You’re not more at risk of dying of coronavirus than the flu.”
With all the reports of COVID deaths, it is important to understand how that term is defined. At the start of the COVID outbreak, the WHO created a very broad definition of what is considered to be a “COVID death”, and this definition was adopted worldwide. According to their definition a COVID death is one where a person had a confirmed or suspected case of COVID at any time, prior to death. This means that what is reported as a COVID death may have another cause, like cancer, heart condition, or accident. Center for Disease Control (CDC) reported that only about 6% of COVID deaths had no comorbidity. This means that 94% of COVID deaths had additional contributing causes of death listed on the death certificate. So even the deaths that are reported as COVID death, are mostly deaths that occurred with COVID and not because of COVID.
The original predictions for infections, hospitalizations and deaths resulting from COVID that led numerous governments to lockdown and implement panic-driven policies, were made in a report from Imperial College led by Neil Ferguson. The report, presented in mid-March 2020, predicted that absent any controls there would be 510,000 deaths in Great Britain and 2.2 million in the U.S. with in the next three months. In na appendix, issued days later, the report listed it’s predictions for other countries including Sweden.
Sweden is significant because it was the only western country not to lockdown in those initial 7 months, it was predicted that they would suffer a minimum of 66,000 deaths by June, when in fact they experienced only 5,900 by September. Here, in the only control group to test the validity of the model, we see it overestimated the number of deaths by a factor of 11. In June, Neil Feguson of the Imperial College admitted that Sweden achieved similar results to the UK without imposing a lockdown.
Fact: COVID was thought to be much more deadly than it actually is.
Continue reading on Source: 10 Key Facts That Unravel The COVID Narrative | America’s Frontline Doctors