You cannot “catch” an illness anymore than you can “catch” health | Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

You cannot “catch” an illness anymore than you can “catch” health. There does appear to be a phenomena though of something you can easily “catch” —- it’s called #FEAR or False Evidence Appearing Real! Talk about a Pandemic; it’s a #FearPandemic 🥺

Source: Dr. Tenpenny




The Balance Between Weight Loss Surgery And Dietary Treatments – By Dr. Garth Davis

Garth Davis, MD, is the medical director of the Davis Clinic at the Methodist Hospital in Houston, Texas, and starred on the hit TLC show Big Medicine. He is certified by the American Board of Surgery and is a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons and a Fellow of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Dr. Davis also competes in marathons and Ironman triathlons and is the author of Proteinaholic.
Connect with The Real Truth About Health:
Passionate believers in whole food plant based diets, no chemicals, minimal pharmaceutical drugs, no GMO’s. Fighting to stop climate change and extinction.
Please support the sponsors of our conference http://www.therealtruthabouthealthcon…

EMA Pfizer Documents on Experimental COVID-19 mRNA Shots Reveal Animal Studies were Conducted during Trials – Risks to Pregnancy being Concealed but Verified by VAERS Data |

By Bud Shaver
Abortion Free New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico

Newly obtained data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), website shows that unborn children in the womb continue to be adversely affected by COVID 19 vaccines at an alarming rate.

Abortion Free New Mexico has also received expert analysis on the animal trials (published by the European Medicines Agency) for these vaccines that confirm what VAERS reports indicate, that these vaccines are harmful and toxic to unborn babies.

Abortion Free New Mexico has previously reported that none of the COVID 19 vaccines have been approved for pregnant women and are being distributed without full approval from the FDA on an emergency approval basis.

In addition, all four of the vaccines currently being distributed are produced and/or tested with cell lines that originated from an aborted child.

As of May 22, 2021, there are a total of 283 adverse reports in VAERS where the symptom is either “spontaneous abortion” or “fetal death”.

Of these, 9.54% are attributed to J&J/Janssen, 36.75% to Moderna and 53.71% to Pfizer BioNTech.

These events are occurring very close to the time of vaccination, and subsequently falling off as time progresses.

This is highly suggestive of a causative link between the vaccination and the adverse event.

In fact, nearly 30% of these events occurred within 0-2 days after vaccination.

Continued …

Source: EMA Pfizer Documents on Experimental COVID-19 mRNA Shots Reveal Animal Studies were Conducted during Trials – Risks to Pregnancy being Concealed but Verified by VAERS Data


ICAN, through its attorneys, has written to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Director of the CDC, and the Commissioner of the FDA about an oft repeated issue: underreporting of adverse events to VAERS.  ICAN highlights Harvard’s findings that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported” and shows real life examples of precisely that for reports of anaphylaxis and deaths to VAERS.  ICAN will continue to demand and take action until they fix this broken system!

On April 30, 2021, ICAN sent a letter to HHS, CDC, and FDA which once again lays out the undeniable underreporting issue with VAERS and points to three clear pieces of evidence to substantiate the concern.

First, an AHRQ-funded study by Harvard Medical School tracked reporting to VAERS over a three-year period at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care involving 715,000 patients and found that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”  A U.S. House Report similarly stated: “Former FDA Commissioner David A. Kessler has estimated that VAERS reports currently represent only a fraction of the serious adverse events.”  The HHS, CDC, and FDA are acutely aware of this fact.

Second, in a recent legal update, ICAN shared a letter sent to the CDC’s Director regarding its claim that “Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare and occurred in approximately 2 to 5 people per million vaccinated in the United States based on events reported to VAERS.”  That claim is contradicted by a recent study at Mass General Brigham that assessed anaphylaxis in a clinical setting after the administration of COVID-19 vaccines and, in stark contrast to the CDC’s claim, found “severe reactions consistent with anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 2.47 per 10,000 vaccinations.”  This is equivalent to 50 times to 120 times more cases than what VAERS and the CDC are reporting! HHS, CDC, and FDA are also aware of this discrepancy thanks to ICAN.

Third, an ACIP meeting again brought into clear focus this incredible level of under reporting for even cases of death.  During the January 27, 2021 meeting, Tom Shimabukuro of the CDC’s COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Task Force, Vaccine Safety Team, explained that it was expected that 11,440 deaths from long term care facilities (“LTCF”) would be reported to VAERS given the number of deaths that would naturally occur during the period directly after COVID-19 vaccination in these facilities:

Instead, VAERS only received 129 reports of deaths following COVID-19 vaccination in LTCF (or 1.1%)!  This again reflects the serious under reporting to VAERS, even for deaths, and is consistent with the study cited above.  This is especially troubling since the need to report to VAERS for deaths after COVID-19 has been repeatedly reiterated to vaccination providers and is required by law.

If anaphylaxis and death are being underreported, imagine the level of underreporting for serious adverse events that do not occur immediately after vaccination or are not easily identified!  This should seriously concern officials at HHS, CDC, and FDA but, given the response to ICAN’s previous letters addressing this topic, it does not appear there is any concern.  If deaths and anaphylaxis are being seriously underreported, there are no-doubt serious safety signals that are being missed for delayed or less obvious harms!

Ignoring and casting aside these issues in the drive to vaccinate and promote vaccine confidence may eventually be the undoing of the very confidence the public health authorities seek to instill.

ICAN made clear to the three agencies that unless and until underreporting to VAERS is addressed, underreporting to a passive signal detection system will continue to blind health agencies, medical professionals, and patients from what is really occurring in the clinic and will render true informed consent impossible.   With the drive to vaccinate every single American with COVID-19 vaccines, the safety of all Americans, literally, depends on this broken system.

ICAN’s message: FIX IT.

The first step to fix it was explained by ICAN: at the least, automate hospital and clinical medical records to automatically send VAERS reports for all clinically significant events occurring within a window of time after vaccination.  This already exists for other purposes.  It can be done for vaccines as well, which is clear from the CDC’s own publications on this topic and pages 31 to 34 of ICAN’s previous letter exchange with HHS on this issue.

ICAN will continue to raise this serious issue with those tasked with our safety.  Until the CDC and FDA, the agencies tasked with operating VAERS, fix this broken system, ICAN will never relent until the pressure to fix this system, including from the mainstream media, forces this result.


Learn About Our New Lawsuit [against the Dept. of Health & Human Services, FDA, CDC, and others concerning use of vaccines in children under the age of 16]! | Dr. Pam Popper |

Source: Learn About Our New Lawsuit!

You can follow Pam on these platforms:

BitChute – The subscribe button is in the upper right hand corner –

Rumble – To subscribe, click on green button in upper right hand corner.

Brighteon – To subscribe, the button is located to the right of Pam’s photo on the left side.

Tell – To follow, the button is located right under her picture banner on the lower right corner.

GAB – To find Pam, enter @PamPopper in search bar.

MINDS – To find Pam, enter @PamPopper in search bar.

ODYSEE – To follow Pam’s page, click Follow in upper right area in the banner.

BRANDNEWTUBE – To find Pam’s channel, go to

Give Wellness Forum Health a call at 614-841-7700.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky on spike protein shedding | America’s Frontline Doctors

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky spoke in an interview about the mechanics of spike protein shedding: “When studies are done on injections that are thought to be vaccine, we sometimes need 7, 10, or even 15 years to really understand what the injection does to the body, and what it does to those around us.

“And so, there’s automatically this assumption that when the authorities say these injections are safe, that we actually have adequate data and adequate observational data to understand whether or not these injections are safe.

“The bottom line is, we don’t have enough data to understand safety.

“The other thing is that we are made to believe in the public eye that this is a vaccine against a viral infection. So the entire world is thinking that this is a vaccine to protect us against SARS Cov2 viral infection. And when you have a vaccine that’s supposed to be effective as a vaccine, you’re supposed to have antibody immunity against the SARS Cov2 virus.  And that’s never been evaluated with these injections as to whether or not we have antibody immunity to a SARS Cov2 virus.

“Instead, what we have is the genetic information of what is believed to be a piece of the SARS Cov2 virus and that piece is called the ‘spike protein’, and the technology that’s being used is a technology to make this injection that’s never been used in vaccine science or methodology before with any kind of success.

“So we are essentially taking the genetic instructions that make a synthetic spike protein believed to be a part of the SARS Cov2 virus, and we’re giving those sets of instructions into the body and asking the human body to take the genetic instructions of that spike protein and make more of it in our own machinery.

“And so, this messenger RNA technology, which is what it’s called, is delivering the genetic instruction for us to make the spike protein. And the problem is that no study has ever been done to test its safety, but also no study is been done to test whether we turn on the production of that spike protein and ever turn it off.

“And so, spike protein in the naturally occurring SARS CoV2 viral infection has been shown to cause brain inflammation and neurological damage, heart attacks, lung disease, liver disease, kidney disease, and interacting with the male and female reproductive systems, along with affecting blood binding to oxygen and blood clotting.

“And so, we know that the natural disease of SARS CoV2, because of the effects of the spike protein, is making people sick with all of these kinds of systemic illnesses. And so now we’re taking that spike protein genetic instructions, and we’re asking our bodies to make more of that spike protein. And so by making more of that spike protein, we are essentially creating the symptoms and the illness of COVID-19 by giving people the potential to have brain damage and neurological damage, lung disease, liver disease, kidney disease, heart attacks, strokes, blood clotting issues, and impairments to male and female reproductive systems.

“And there’s no study to show whether when the body starts manufacturing the synthetic spike protein – whether or not we ever turn off the production of that spike protein.

“And so that spike protein is known to be pretty damaging to the human tissue. And so, we know that spike protein has been found in saliva, we know that it’s been found in the anus, and we have to ask the question: Is it found in the exhalation molecules that come out of our breath? Is it found in the skin when we sweat and we smell the spike proteins come out? And if so, does that impact other people with whom we come in contact?

“And so, what we’ve been seeing is a massive increase in those who’ve been given the injection of blood clotting problems, miscarriages, stillborns, infertility, stroke, heart attack, autoimmune diseases, and death, just to name a few, and that’s in those who been injected.  So certainly there should be a suspicion when you see people around the injected people who have not been injected getting the typical symptoms of COVID in addition to miscarriages, bleeding, irregular menstrual cycles; it should raise a very, very strong suspicion.

“The spike protein is, we are told, just specific to the SARS CoV2 virus, so that when your body makes the synthetic spike protein, you’re supposed to produce an antibody that’s supposed to attack the spike protein.

“Now, we don’t know if that spike protein production keeps going and going and going, and that would make the antibody production keep going and going and going as well. And the thing is, that we are finding that the genetic instructions of the spike protein are not specific just to the SARS CoV2 virus. The genetic instructions of the spike protein are also similar to, or the same as, many proteins that exist in the body itself.

“And so therefore, if we’re going to produce an antibody against the genetic instructions of the spike protein, those antibodies are going to find every bit of protein tissue around the body that matches the genetic instructions of the spike protein, and that antibody to the spike protein genetic instructions is going to produce an attack on any of the proteins and tissues in the body that are similar or the same to the genetic instructions of the spike protein. So that’s why you’ll see autoimmune diseases.” Continued on Source:

Visit Dr. Palevsky’s website for more information:

CDC: Death Toll Following Experimental COVID Injections Now at 4,647 – More than 22 Years of Recorded Vaccine Deaths from VAERS

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The CDC released the latest death figures following the experimental COVID injections this week, and that death toll now stands at 4,647 people, adults and children, that have been recorded as dying after receiving one of the experimental COVID injections.


To put this number in perspective, since the CDC continues to claim that these deaths do “not establish a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines,” these deaths now exceed the total number of deaths reported to VAERS following vaccination for the past 22 years!

From 1/1/1999 through 11/30/2020 (the last month before COVID shots were given emergency use) there were 4,571 deaths recorded for a span of 22 years.

Please take note that for that 22-year period, over 50% of the recorded deaths following vaccination were infants and toddlers under the age of 3, because this is the next targeted demographic to receive the experimental COVID shots: young children.

The Friday 5/21/21 data dump by the CDC into VAERS lists 4,201 of the reported deaths, along with 227,805 injuries including 2,719 Permanent Disabilities, 29,708 Emergency Room visits, and 12,625 Hospitalizations.

Continued on Source …

Source: CDC: Death Toll Following Experimental COVID Injections Now at 4,647 – More than 22 Years of Recorded Vaccine Deaths from VAERS

The Forbidden COVID-19 Chronicles | Why Many People Are Not Getting a COVID Vaccine – Part V | Pamela A. Popper, President, Wellness Forum Health

According to an article published in the British Medical Journal in October 2020, the COVID-19 vaccine trials were not designed to determine if the vaccines were safe or effective.[1] This was a problem since the primary reason for getting any vaccine should be because it has been proven to be safe and to prevent serious illness, hospitalization, and death.

The author, Peter Doshi, is associate editor of the journal. He begins by stating that while Anthony Fauci and the FDA assured the public that only safe and effective vaccines would be made available, this was not possible due to study design.

The phase III trials of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were designed to end after 150-160 “events” were reported. The definition of an event was quite liberal and could include a person with a cough and a positive lab test. Mild symptoms and a test with a very high false positive rate (see articles on this topic in the Health Briefs Library) made it easy to record the required number of events, end the trial early, and apply for Emergency Use Authorization. This might be good for drug company sales, but what about consumers?

Doshi gives the drug companies the benefit if the doubt on study design, pointing out that one of the reasons for categorizing mild symptoms and a test as an event might have been that the rate of severe illness and hospitalization due to COVID-19 was so low – only 3.4% overall. This means that even trials with tens of thousands of patients would only show a few cases of severe illness. And these trials were much smaller. Of course, a reasonable person might ask why a vaccine is needed for a disease that has a such a low rate of severe illness and hospitalization and an overall survival rate of 99.98%. But as we have learned during the last 15 months, reasonable people are not in charge of our government right now.

Doshi reports that the drug companies acknowledged the limitations of the trials. Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, admitted that the trial could not determine whether or not the vaccine reduced hospitalizations based on its size and duration. This did not stop Moderna from reporting to the media that hospital admissions were a “key secondary endpoint.”

Zaks also admitted that the trial could not determine whether or not the vaccine reduced the risk of death from COVID, stating “Would I like to know that this prevents mortality? Sure, because I believe it does. I just don’t think it’s feasible within the timeframe [of the trial]…”

And then Zaks admitted that the trials would not even demonstrate that the vaccine would prevent transmission because a trial that would evaluate this endpoint would take too long and would be too expensive. Really? Moderna received almost a billion dollars from The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services. The taxpayers funded the development of this vaccine and Moderna is arguing that proving efficacy is too expensive.[2] Really?

But that’s not all. the federal government also committed $1.5 billion for 100 million doses of the Moderna vaccine. Americans did not get a vaccine that was safe and effective, but we did make Moderna executives rich. Stock sales that coincided with announcements of trial results totaled $100 million dollars for just three executives.[3]

in addition to providing funding, the U.S. government assisted Moderna by distributing false information about the trials. A press release from the National Institutes of Health stated that Moderna’s trial “aims to study whether the vaccine can prevent severe covid-19” and “seeks to answer if the vaccine can prevent death caused by covid-19.”

Doshi writes that most of the general public assumes that the point of the trials is to test safety and efficacy, and asks Zaks, “How do you reconcile that?”

I give Zaks credit for honesty. He replied, “Very simply…we have a bad outcome as our endpoint. It’s covid-19 disease.” In other words, NIH press releases concerning the Moderna vaccine were patently false, and the trial was a charade.

Doshi points out that issues with study design for trials of flu vaccines are not new. He reports that only two placebo-controlled trials including elderly people living in community settings have ever been conducted, and neither was designed to evaluate differences in hospital admissions or deaths. A further limitation is that increased uptake of flu vaccines has not led to a reduction in mortality from flu.

Shockingly, Peter Marks, an FDA official involved with vaccine approvals agreed, stating that flu vaccines only prevent flu in about half of the people who get them.

Perhaps most alarming is Doshi’s warning about adverse events resulting from vaccines that were rushed to market in the past – like the COVID vaccines. Examples include contaminated polio vaccines in 1955, cases of Guillain Barre as a result of flu vaccines in 1976, and narcolepsy which was a side effect of one flu vaccine in 2009.[4]

The only reason a person would agree to receive one of these vaccines is ignorance of the facts, and the government and vaccine makers are working very hard to make sure that people do not have access to factual information.

[1] Doshi P. “Will COVID vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us.” BMJ 2020;371:m4037
[2] Judy Stone. The People’s Vaccine – Moderna’s Coronavirus Vaccine Was Largely Funded By Taxpayer Dollars. Forbes December 3 2020
[3] IBID
[4] Doshi P. “Will COVID vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us.” BMJ 2020;371:m4037

Looking for articles from previous newsletters? The newsletters are included in the Health Briefs Online Library, accessible through A search engine on the site can help you to easily locate all of the articles that contain information about the topic you are researching.

Make Americans Free Again!

HOW TO BAN VACCINE VERIFICATION | The Healthy American | Peggy Hall


As predicted, the public servant LAW BREAKERS are looking for ways to kick the can down the road, telling businesses that they can require a vaccine verification as a condition of entry/services.


We will NEVER RELENT in keeping our eagle eye over these public servants.

Thus, if you can join us yet again….

Orange County Board of Supervisors

Tue, 5/25, 9:00 am

333 W. Santa Ana Blvd. Santa Ana, CA


Adapt my talking points and fight this in your area!


To the Board:

Forcing a medical experiment upon an individual as a condition to participate in society is illegal, unlawful and immoral and reprehensible and it is a violation of our God-given, Natural, and Common Law rights, as expressed and confirmed in the American Declaration of Independence, and as reflected in the constitution of this state and the constitution of the United States.

1. There is no emergency. There never has been one. The numbers don’t support it.

2. This board is perpetuating the notion of an emergency to get money, to impose tyranny and to unlawfully force medical experimentation upon the populace. This so-called vaccine has only gotten an emergency use authorization under the guise of an emergency; otherwise the EUA is null and void (by the way, masks and covid tests are EUAs as well.)

3. Even if this could be called an emergency, no emergency suspends one’s rights. Rights cannot be taken from you.

4. This board is perpetrating fraud, and fraud is a felony and a felony carries a prison sentence. You are hereby notified that if you engage in harassment, intimidation and/or retaliation against any member of the public including me, for this statement of truth, such actions will be reported to the FBI.

It doesn’t matter whether vaccines work or not.

It doesn’t matter whether this is even a vaccine or not.

What matters is that each individual has sovereignty and authority over their own body.

We know what this board is doing.

We know exactly what this board is doing.

Here’s the real truth:

These so-called vaccine can never be required as a condition for commerce.

Among many laws that protect individuals from the excess power of government tyrants, here are just a few…

1. EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION LIMITATIONS on All COVID-19 vaccines , which are under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and cannot be made mandatory.

On its website, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notes the following: “…Recipients must be informed… that they have the option to accept or refuse the vaccine .”

2. Forced vaccination violates the right to privacy, which is protected, secured and guaranteed by the 4th Amendment of the US and the constitution of this state.

3. Forced vaccination is unlawful DISCRIMINATION, discriminating against those who have cell phones or want to participate in AI.

Further, forced vaccination is a violation of:

Continued on Source …